You can hold Bitcoin, Ethereum or another eligible digital asset worth tens of thousands of dollars and still find yourself short on cash. That is the difference between wealth and liquidity.
Imagine holding $50,000 in digital assets and suddenly needing $5,000. Selling part of the portfolio solves the immediate cash problem, but it also permanently reduces your ownership of the asset you sold.
If that asset later appreciates, you no longer participate in the appreciation of the portion you sold. More importantly, your reason for selling may have had nothing to do with your long-term investment view. You simply needed liquidity today.
Your investment decision and your liquidity decision do not always have to be the same decision.
A temporary need for cash does not necessarily mean your long-term view of an asset has changed.
That is the idea behind collateralized borrowing. Instead of automatically disposing of an eligible asset, a borrower may be able to pledge it as collateral and receive liquidity under agreed lending terms. The principle is similar to secured lending elsewhere in finance: the asset supports the borrowing arrangement rather than being sold outright.
But collateral does not remove risk. Digital assets can be volatile. As collateral value changes, the loan-to-value ratio can change as well. Depending on the agreement, a sufficiently high LTV can lead to additional collateral requirements or liquidation.
So the better question is not simply, “Can I borrow against my crypto?” It is: “Can I responsibly manage the repayment obligation, cost of borrowing, and collateral risk?”